Overview of Management Systems For EHS Professionals
Click on link above to download presentation slides from " Environmental and Safety Management Systems For EHS Professionals"
Discussion and comments on Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) regulations, auditing, and regulatory compliance
Recently, there has been an increased interest in conducting “Systems Audits” especially within businesses or agencies already familiar with “Compliance Audits”. In this article, we will compare Systems Auditing to traditional Compliance Auditing.
Compliance auditing tends to be a straight-forward process. Objective evidence is collected to determine the status of compliance relative to specific requirements. Often these will be regulatory requirements, but compliance audits can be conducted relative to company or agency policies or procedures. To conduct a compliance audit, the auditor needs to know what the specific requirements are. Based on documentation review and observations made by the auditor, compliance with these requirements is evaluated.
Compliance auditing tends to develop a “snap-shot” of compliance on the day the audit was conducted. The purpose is to determine whether or not the auditee is in compliance, and not how compliance is attained.
Systems audits extend beyond strict compliance on the day of the audit. Although compliance with requirements is an important factor in a systems audit, providing an indication of system effectiveness, auditing the process leading to compliance is just as important.
For systems audits, the auditor needs to not only understand the specific compliance requirements, but also needs to understand the system the auditee uses to attain compliance. To pass a systems audit, the auditee must be in compliance with requirements and must demonstrate that an effective system is in place and being implemented to continuously be in compliance.
Systems audits will assess the compliance assurance system, and not simply assess the status of compliance on the day of the audit. Because a systems audit requires more intimate knowledge of the systems being used by the auditee, typically a systems auditor will request more information prior to the audit, including documents such as written plans and procedures, training requirements, etc. Often, systems audits will focus on specific areas, rather than being a site-wide assessment.
Systems audits offer a clear advantage beyond compliance audits – they address the underlying processes in place to assure on-going compliance. Systems audits also require a higher level of effort by the auditor and involve a broader range of personnel at a facility.
Caltha LLP provides specialized expertise to clients nationwide in the conducting compliance audits and environmental management systems audits, training internal auditors, and preparing cost-effective compliance management programs.
For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com
or
Caltha LLP Website
For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com
or
Caltha LLP Website
"Should I include a compliance audit as part of my environmental due diligence?”
This question arises frequently during environmental due diligence for mergers and acquisitions. The answer is actually relevant to many types of transactions, whether a business is being acquired, or if “assets only” are being purchased.
Compliance with applicable regulations can have a significant financial impact on a business transaction; however, separating and focusing on key issues will reduce the level of effort required and eliminate spending time and resources collecting information that has very little impact on the transaction.
Many of the “best-in-class” companies conduct routine environmental compliance audits of their operations. The important point is that even the best run companies will find compliance issues at their facilities and will routinely be in corrective action to improve their operations and address any deficiencies. Often, these non-compliance issues are administrative, such as maintaining required documentation, or training-related. Once the deficiency is identified, it can be quickly remedied at little or no cost.
While considering using a formal Environmental Compliance Audit during due diligence, it should acknowledged that most audits will identify some areas of improvement within the organization. Given this, careful consideration should be given to how this information will be used in the due diligence effort. Given the time frame typically allowed for due diligence, it is often difficult to conduct a formal compliance audit. Beyond the time constraints, confidentially concerns may limit access to facility staff who would typically be an integral part of the audit process. And in the end, the the most important consideration will be whether or not the information gathered will be useful to business decisions regarding the transaction.
In many cases, a COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT is more useful that a COMPLIANCE AUDIT. For more information:
Article comparing Environmental Compliance Assessments to Compliance Audits
For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com
or
Caltha LLP Website
Recently, there has been an increased interest in conducting “Systems Audits” especially within businesses or agencies already familiar with “Compliance Audits”. In this article, we compare Systems Auditing to traditional Compliance Auditing.
Compliance auditing tends to be a straight-forward process. Objective evidence is collected to determine the status of compliance relative to specific requirements. Often these will be regulatory requirements, but compliance audits can be conducted relative to company or agency policies or procedures. To conduct a compliance audit, the auditor needs to know what the specific requirements are. Based on documentation review and observations made by the auditor, compliance with these requirements is evaluated.
Compliance auditing tends to develop a “snap-shot” of compliance on the day the audit was conducted. The important point is whether or not the auditee is in compliance, and not how compliance is attained.
Systems audits extend beyond strict compliance on the day of the audit. Although compliance with requirements is an important factor in a systems audit, providing an indication of system effectiveness, auditing the process leading to compliance is just as important.
For systems audits, the auditor needs to not only understand the specific compliance requirements, but also needs to understand the system the auditee uses to attain compliance. To pass a systems audit, the auditee must be in compliance with requirements and must demonstrate that an effective system is in place and being implemented to continuously be in compliance.
Systems audits will assess the compliance assurance system, and not simply assess the status of compliance on the day of the audit. Because a systems audit requires more intimate knowledge of the systems being used by the auditee, typically a systems auditor will request more information prior to the audit, including documents such as written plans and procedures, training requirements, etc. Often, systems audits will focus on specific areas, rather than being a site-wide assessment.
As an example, we will consider how a systems audit would address a specific compliance issue –proper labeling of drums in a hazardous waste storage area. In this case, drums of hazardous waste must be properly labeled; this is very straight forward for a compliance auditing process. The specific requirements for labeling are well documented and apply to all facilities that store hazardous waste. The auditor simply reviews the labeling documentation and determines if it meets these requirements.
Auditing the proper labeling of the hazardous waste drums with a systems auditing approach will require that the auditor understand the process the facility uses to assure that drums are properly labeled. While the requirements for labeling are generic and apply to all facilities that store hazardous waste, the system to assure proper labeling will be unique to each facility.
The compliance audit reviewed one type of document –the drum label –to determine compliance. The systems audit may review a broad range of documents related to the facility’s compliance system; for example,
A systems auditor may also conduct interviews with key staff to assure they have been trained and understand the procedures they need to follow.
Systems audits offer a clear advantage beyond compliance audits – they address the underlying processes in place to assure on-going compliance. Systems audits also require a higher level of effort by the auditor and involve a broader range of personnel at a facility.
For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com
or
Caltha LLP Website